| coliel wrote:
|
i know you think as the animal was bred for food it wasnt going to have a great quality of life but you would be suprised the fun some of the lambs have - i use to have a pet lamb and we had great fun but we still ate her as that was her purpose in life.
|
I respect that you can actually kill your food and eat it, unlike many hypocrites who couldn't yet still eat meat pretending its off a tree, but in regards to the deformed lamb I do think that lamb should have just been killed because if it had been born in the wild, it would have been killed within the hour of being born.
shadylady - Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:54 pm
Post subject:
poor little lamb...
coliel - Fri Aug 03, 2007 7:54 pm
Post subject:
yes it would of been killed quickly if it was in the wild - but it wasnt!!
lots of animals would die in the wild like a litter of pups when the dam dies but it dosent mean you shouldnt bottle feed the pups or when we had cold springs and we would take in the day old chicks and put them in socks by the fier - they would die but as they are cared for by man they have a much better chance of sevivel.
Beckyess - Fri Aug 03, 2007 8:07 pm
Post subject:
but we shouldn't preserve life at any cost. Quality of life is far more important to me. I doubt this lamb has any quality of life.
Becky
coliel - Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:35 pm
Post subject:
but i dont feel that it is are right to presume that,
forexample when gypsie was put down i new she was in pain she was not herself, she would just wimper, she weed and pooed herself, had fits , couldnt understand any comands - she simply was not gypsie any more .
im not saying i wouldnt put the lamb down what im saying is i wouldnt just because she was born abnormaly i would want to see how she was with the condition first.
Beckyess - Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:34 am
Post subject:
In a domestic pet then yes I'd agree with you but in farm livestock then no. They are bred for meat, they aren't pampered like our pets, I'm not saying they aren't cared for but it's different.
Becky
Josh - Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:36 am
Post subject:
Poor thing
clareabella - Sat Aug 04, 2007 10:04 am
Post subject:
even the vet says its inhumane to keep it alive.
coliel - Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:02 pm
Post subject:
yes and i do think that it may need putting down , what i dont like is when an animal is killed with out a chance the amount of farmers/breeders who kill a runt as it "wasts the mothers milk"
or because it has somthing wrong with it is very high and believe me these animals arnt put to sleep by a vet they are often drowned or have their neck broken!! - as vet fees are high and no one needs to know wether an animal died at birth or not !
i believe alot of these animals can do just as well as the stronger contenders if given the chance!
coliel - Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:04 pm
Post subject:
sorry i should also say that of corce the vet says he should be putdown as he would rather the farmer pay for it than for it to die natrely!!
Josh - Mon Aug 06, 2007 8:21 am
Post subject:
Awww Poor Lamb
All times are GMT
Powered by phpBB 2.0 .0.11 © 2001
phpBB
Group